The Reality of Agricultural Targeting and Forced Mandates

The Reality of Agricultural Targeting and Forced Mandates

The Reality of Agricultural Targeting and Forced Mandates 

The Dutch government has recently announced a plan to close up to 3,000 farms in order to comply with an European Union environmental mandate. This follows a research report released in 2021 that outlined a 30 percent reduction of livestock by 2030 to cut nitrogen oxide and ammonia by 50 percent. This is an unfortunate reality of the control being placed on farmers, as well as the involuntary mandates they are facing in order to reduce fertilizers to the food supply.

Sign up for Prepper Daves Free Newsletter HERE

The Dangers of Targeting Farmers 

Targeting farmers for closure can mean reduced access to food sources for individuals and families alike. It also limits our ability to be self-sufficient and independent from government control. With fewer options available to us when it comes to producing our own food sources, we become more reliant on government-sponsored programs or corporate entities that can manipulate prices or limit our access altogether. This puts us at greater risk of becoming enslaved by our own government or manipulated by powerful interests that do not have our best interests at heart.

The Dutch Government Targets Farmers 

Targeting farmers for closure is an all-too-common practice among governments who wish to reduce environmental pollutants and increase their own power over citizens’ lives. By targeting small farms, governments believe they can ensure compliance from larger farms and agricultural businesses that are more difficult to regulate due to their size and legal complexity. In this case, the Dutch government has set targets to reduce nitrogen pollution by up to 70% by 2030 in some areas, in response to rulings by the European Court of Justice and the Netherlands’ Council of State that Dutch policies were not adequately addressing the problem.

To do this, they have identified certain farms as “high-risk” for producing excess nitrogen emissions. These farms are then targeted for closure or drastic reduction in size. This is a clear example of governments using their powers against citizens with no regard for individual rights or freedoms.

The Dutch government is just one example of increased mandates

The Dutch government’s targeting of farmers is just one example of how governments use their power against citizens without regard for individual rights or freedoms; however, it serves as a useful reminder that we must remain vigilant in protecting our freedoms if we wish to remain free from tyranny both now and in the future. By understanding the risks associated with targeting farmers and taking steps towards mitigating them where possible we can ensure that our rights are protected even when governments seek increased control over our lives through measures such as these.

Involuntary Mandates 

In addition to targeting farmers for closure, governments also rely on involuntary mandates in order to reduce fertilizers and other pollutants from entering into the food supply. These mandates require farmers and agricultural businesses to adhere strictly to certain rules or face penalties such as fines or even forced buyouts if voluntary measures fail. For example, if a farmer does not meet the required standards for reducing fertilizer use, they may be subject to fines or even forced closure if voluntary measures are unsuccessful.

Farmers Unite 

Farmers around the world have taken it upon themselves to protest these measures in order to protect their livelihoods and preserve their way of life. In response, several farm organizations have formed alliances against government regulations that threaten their way of life. This includes protesting against involuntary mandates as well as engaging with legislators on policy changes that will help protect small family farms from being targeted by large corporations or governments seeking greater control over their affairs.

In conclusion, it is clear that targeting farmers for closure and instituting involuntary mandates are dangerous practices that threaten both local economies and food security worldwide. It is imperative that we stand together with our fellow farmers in support of their rights so we can ensure our food supply remains safe from interference from those who seek only control over our lives through oppressive regulations. We must take action now before it is too late!

Takeaways

  • The Dutch government has recently announced a plan to close up to 3,000 farms in order to comply with a European Union environmental mandate.
  • Targeting farmers for closure can mean reduced access to food sources for individuals and families alike. It also limits our ability to be self-sufficient and independent from government control.
  • The Dutch government’s targeting of farmers is just one example of how governments use their power against citizens without regard for individual rights or freedoms; however, it serves as a useful reminder that we must remain vigilant in protecting our freedoms if we wish to remain free from tyranny both now and in the future.
  • In addition to targeting farmers for closure, governments also rely on involuntary mandates in order to reduce fertilizers and other pollutants from entering into the food supply.
  • Farmers around the world have taken it upon themselves to protest these measures in order to protect their livelihoods and preserve their way of life.
  • We must work together with our fellow farmers in support of their rights so we can ensure our food supply remains safe from interference from those who seek only control over our lives through oppressive regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are fertilizers and what do they do?

Fertilizers are substances that are added to the soil to provide essential nutrients for plant growth. They can help increase crop yields, improve soil quality, and reduce the need for pesticide applications. However, excessive use of fertilizers can also lead to runoff pollution that can negatively impact water quality and food safety.

How are fertilizers used in food production?

Fertilizers are commonly used by farmers and agricultural businesses to improve crop yields and help maintain the quality of soil over time. They can also be added to the soil in order to help plants withstand certain pests, diseases, or weather conditions that may otherwise cause significant damage.

What are the benefits of using fertilizers?

Some of the main benefits of using fertilizers in food production include increased crop yields, improved soil quality, and reduced need for pesticide applications. These can help ensure the long-term sustainability and health of food sources, while also supporting the livelihoods of farmers and agricultural workers.

What are the dangers of reducing fertilizers to the food supply?

One of the main dangers associated with reducing fertilizers in food production is that it can negatively impact crop yields, which could ultimately lead to reduced food supplies and increased food prices.

What are some of the worst ways to reduce fertilizers to the food supply?

Some of the worst ways to reduce fertilizers in food production include instituting involuntary mandates, targeting farmers for closure, and interfering with normal agricultural practices. These can all have detrimental impacts on food safety, access to food sources, and the livelihoods of farmers and agricultural workers. As such, we must work together to protect these rights and defend our ability to produce food independently, free from government interference.

What are the dangers of reducing access to food sources for individuals and groups?

One of the biggest dangers of reducing access to food sources for individuals and groups is that it can lead to increased hunger, malnutrition, and poverty. This can have serious impacts on health, development, and overall quality of life for those affected. Additionally, it can limit our ability to be self-sufficient and independent, which is essential for preserving our basic rights and freedoms.

Can reducing access to food sources lead to conflict?

Yes, reducing access to food sources can lead to conflict, as it can create severe economic hardship and distress that can increase social tensions and resentment. This can create conditions that are ripe for further conflict and violence, threatening stability and safety for all parties involved.

What are some of the historical examples of reducing access to food sources?

Some of the most notable historical examples of reducing access to food sources include the Great Depression in the 1930s, during which millions of people were impacted by food shortages and extreme poverty. Other examples include the Irish Potato Famine in the mid-1800s, which led to widespread hunger and death in Ireland, and the Siege of Leningrad during World War II, which was largely caused by food shortages and starvation.

Disclaimer

While we attempt to ensure that the information is accurate, we cannot guarantee its completeness or accuracy. If you find errors or omissions, please let us know. We do not assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information provided here. You should consult a professional before making important decisions.

If you would like to discuss this topic further or have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us. We look forward to hearing from you.

%d bloggers like this: