The Bengal Famine of 1943 is one of the most tragic famines in history. An estimated 2.0-3.5 million people died due to widespread starvation and disease, and millions more were severely affected. The famine was caused by a combination of factors including increased population accompanied by a decrease in agricultural productivity, war-related inflation, poor weather conditions, and disruptions in food supply. These factors led to widespread crop failures and severe shortages of food. The government was slow to respond with aid, exacerbating the effects of the famine. It is estimated that the province’s GDP declined by 10% during the famine years.
Increased population accompanied by a decrease in agricultural productivity
Beginning at the turn of the century the population of Bengal had been growing at an exponential rate, from a population of about 42 million in 1901 to over 60 million by 1941. Due, in part to land shortages, the increase in population was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in agricultural productivity. The result was the inability of the province to produce enough food to meet the needs of its growing population. Bengal is an agricultural province and most of its inhabitants were dependent on agriculture for their livelihood.
Sign up for Prepper Daves Free Newsletter HERE
The majority of the land was owned by a small number of zamindars, or landlords, who often did not invest in improving the productivity of their land. In addition, the British colonial government had enacted a series of policies that favored large landowners and made it difficult for small farmers to compete. As a result, the agricultural sector was in decline even before the famine hit.
The jotedars, or wealthy peasants, were better able to weather the effects of the famine than the poorer peasants. The jotedars had more land and resources, and they also had the means to buy food from the black market. The poorer peasants, on the other hand, were forced to sell their land and belongings in order to buy food. As the famine progressed, many of them were reduced to begging or scavenging for food.
The ryot, bargadars, or agricultural laborers, were the worst affected by the famine. They did not own land and were completely dependent on the landlords for their livelihood. When the crops failed, they had no source of income and were forced to starve.
War-related inflation also contributed to the Bengal Famine. Prices of food and other essential commodities rose sharply due to the increase in demand from the war effort, making it difficult for people to afford basic necessities.
There is still much debate about whether the British government had the resources to provide relief but were slow to respond or they didn’t have the resources to provide relief to India because they were already struggling to cope with the high cost of WWII. Others maintain that even if the British government was stretched thin, they could have done more to provide relief sooner and that their delay in doing so led to needless deaths. Either way, the death toll was catastrophic.
Poor weather conditions.
In addition to the other factors that contributed to the Bengal Famine, poor weather conditions exacerbated the effects of the famine. The summer of 1943 was unusually hot and dry, leading to a poor monsoon season. This resulted in widespread crop failures, further reducing the food supply and exacerbating the effects of the famine.
Disruptions in food supply.
The Bengal Famine was also caused by disruptions in the food supply. The province was reliant on imported rice from Burma, and when Burma was occupied by the Japanese in 1942, the flow of rice into Bengal stopped. This, combined with the poor weather conditions and the already stretched food supply, led to widespread starvation.
What can we learn from the Bengal Famine of 1943?
The Bengal Famine was one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 20th century. It is estimated that between two and three and a half million people died from starvation and disease, making it one of the deadliest famines in history. The Bengal Famine is also a tragic story of widespread mismanagement and neglect. In addition, the Bengal Famine is a reminder of the importance of agricultural productivity and food security. It is estimated that if the agricultural sector had been in better shape, the Bengal Famine could have been prevented.
Frequently Asked Questions:
What caused the Bengal Famine of 1943?
There are a number of factors that contributed to the Bengal Famine. These include the decline of the agricultural sector, war-related inflation, poor weather conditions, and disruptions in the food supply.
How many people died in the Bengal Famine?
It is estimated that between two and three million people died from starvation and disease.
Who was responsible for the Bengal Famine?
There is much debate about who was responsible for the Bengal Famine. The British government has been criticized for its slow response to the famine, and for its failure to provide adequate relief. However, local officials and landlords have also been blamed for their role in the famine.
What can we learn from the Bengal Famine?
The Bengal Famine is a reminder of the importance of agricultural productivity and food security. It is also a reminder of the need for effective government action in times of crisis.
What were the “scorched-earth policies”?
The British military launched a “scorched-earth policy” in eastern and coastal Bengal in anticipation of a Japanese invasion. The goal was to deny the expected invaders access to food, transport and other resources.
What were Provincial trade barriers?
Inter-provincial trade barriers were common in many Indian provinces and princely states from mid-1942. Provincial governments (under the Defense of India Act, 1939) began erecting trade barriers that prevented the flow of foodgrains and other goods between provinces. These barriers caused anxiety and soaring rice prices.
What was The Famine Inquiry Commission of 1945?
The Famine Inquiry Commission of 1945 was created to investigate the root causes of the Bengal famine. The commission found that a key policy failure was the lack of coordination between provinces in the east of India. This led to market failures and food shortages, which ultimately resulted in the death of millions of people. The commission’s report was critical of the British government’s response to the famine, and it recommended a number of changes to policy.
What was Prioritized distribution?
To ensure that limited resources were allocated efficiently, the Indian government during World War II established a system of prioritize distribution based on socioeconomic groups. The “priority” classes, which included the bhadraloks (upper-class or bourgeois middle-class), received preferential treatment in terms of access to essential goods and services. This was due to the belief that these groups were more likely to be supportive of the war effort and sympathetic to Western values. Meanwhile, the “non-priority” classes – made up of the rural poor, tribals, and urban slum-dwellers – were given less priority in terms of resource allocation. This system caused significant hardship for many people, particularly those who were already vulnerable before the war.
What were the Indian Famine Codes?
The Indian Famine Codes were a set of three famine scales developed by the British colonial government in the 1880s. The first level, near-scarcity, was defined as two successive years of crop failure. The second level, scarcity, was defined as three successive years of crop failure, crop yields of one-third or one-half normal, and large populations in distress. The third and final level, famine, included a rise in food prices to above 140% of “normal”, the movement of people in search of food, and widespread mortality.
Were the Famine Codes useful?
The Indian Famine Codes were an important tool for the British government in understanding and responding to famines in India. The Codes helped to standardize the definition of a famine and to provide a consistent basis for relief efforts. Despite their importance, the Codes were not without criticism. Some argue that the Codes were developed with a bias against Indians, and that they did not adequately take into account the cultural and economic context of famines in India. Nevertheless, the Indian Famine Codes remain an important part of the history of famine response and prevention.
Did the provincial government declare a state of famine?
The provincial authority felt that it had a duty to protect its citizens’ morale and confidence, especially in light of the fact that there were no shortages of food. In order to do this, the government made the decision not to distribute any food, even though this went against the Famine Code. The hope was that shipments from India would arrive soon and provide enough food for the population to grow over time. However, when these shipments failed to materialize, the situation quickly deteriorated, leading to widespread famine and death.
Share your thoughts and ideas in the contact us section. Thank you for reading.