Cancer Conspiracy Theories: Is the Government Hiding a Cure?

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In the United States, cancer is the second leading cause of death. Every year, over 600,000 people die from cancer in America alone. There are many different theories out there about cancer and its causes. Some say that it is caused by environmental factors, while others believe that it is a result of lifestyle choices. Regardless of the cause, this blog post will explore the possibility that the government is hiding a cure for cancer.

There are many cancer conspiracy theories out there, but one of the most disturbing is the idea that the government is hiding a cure for cancer. You may ask, why would the Government hide a cure for cancer? There are a few possible explanations. Some people believe that the government is hiding a cure for cancer to maintain their power. Others think that it’s a way to control the population.

At Prepper Daves we are always working hard on bringing you the latest Free Newsletter packed with information about homesteading and preparedness as well as hunting, fishing, trapping, and shooting. We will also send you a Free Copy of our Sunday Paper that covers wide range subjects such current events, politics, policy, markets, defense, energy, science, investigations, education, and history.

The theory goes that if the government has a cure for cancer, they can use it as a way to control the population. They can use it as a bargaining chip, or they can use it to blackmail people. Others question this theory by asking; if the government has a cure for cancer, why wouldn’t they use it to improve the lives of their citizens? Why would they use it as a way to control the population?

 

 

Population controls are in the minds of many world leaders. They know that the planet cannot sustain an ever-growing population, and they are looking for ways to curb it. What would happen if the population didn’t have an average global life expectancy of 72.6 years and was instead 85 or 90 years? How long would it take for the world to become overpopulated?

Bill Gates’ view on population control is well-known. In a TED talk, he said that the world needs to find a way to reduce the population. One of the ways to do this, he said, is by giving everyone access to contraception and family planning (is he talking about abortions – hmmm). He is also part of an agenda to vaccinate the world’s population, which some say is a way to control the population by reducing the number of births.

The Democratic Party has as part of their platform, “reproductive health” and “family planning”. This is in line with the WHO’s view on population control. There are many that believe this is strictly about access to abortion on demand, but it’s also about contraception and sex education. The idea is to reduce the population by reducing the number of births.

The World Health Organization’s view on population control is a bit more subtle. They don’t explicitly say that the world’s population needs to be reduced, but they do support things like abortion and contraception. They also advocate for “reproductive health” which some say is a way to control the population by reducing the number of births. To push home their narative, they have worked with the United Nations on a plan going forward; Agenda 2030.

 

 

The facade of Agenda 2030 is that it is a set of goals that the UN has put together to try and improve the world. The goals range from reducing poverty to improving education to protecting the environment. But, if you look a little closer, you’ll see that many of the goals are about reducing and controlling the population.

It’s not just world leaders and politicians that are concerned about population growth. Many scientists have sounded the alarm about the population crisis. In 2009, James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia hypothesis, said that the world’s population needs to be reduced by at least six billion people. He said that the world is overpopulated and that we need to find a way to reduce the population.

The pharmaceutical industry also has a vested interested in keeping people on medications. If there was a cure for cancer, it would put them out of business. The cost of treatment for cancer is skyrocketing, and it’s not just the cost of the drugs. It’s the cost of the hospital stay, the surgeries, and the radiation. If there was a cure for cancer, it would put a dent in their profits.

The medical industry also has a vested interest in keeping people sick. The amount of money that is spent on health care is astronomical, and it’s only going to increase as the population ages. If there was a cure for cancer, they would lose money from the treatments and surgeries that are currently being performed.

So, what does all this have to do with cancer? There are a few things that are worth considering. First, the government is not transparent about what they are doing with our tax dollars. Second, the government is not transparent about their agenda. Third, the government is not transparent about their relationship with the pharmaceutical and medical industries. All these things lead to suspicion and mistrust.

The government is not transparent about what they are doing with our tax dollars. We know that they are spending a lot of money on research, but we don’t know what they are actually researching. They could be researching a cure for cancer, but they could also be researching ways to control the population. We just don’t know.

The government is not transparent about their agenda. We know that they are concerned about population growth, but we don’t know what their ultimate goal is. Are they trying to find a way to reduce the population, or are they trying to find a way to control the population? We just don’t know.

The government is not transparent about their relationship with the pharmaceutical and medical industries. We know that they are working together, but we don’t know what their ultimate goal is. Are they trying to find a way to cure cancer, or are they trying to find a way to keep people sick? We just don’t know.

All these things lead to suspicion and mistrust. When the government is not transparent about what they are doing, it makes us suspicious. When the government is not transparent about their agenda, it makes us mistrustful. When the government is not transparent about their relationship with the pharmaceutical and medical industries, it makes us question their motives.

Do you think that the government is hiding a cure for cancer? Do you think that they are working with the pharmaceutical and medical industries to keep people sick? Do you think that their ultimate goal is to control the population? Let us know in the contact us section.

Thank you for reading. I hope this article has helped to raise awareness about the dangers we face today in America. Let us know in the contact us section.

Please follow us on Facebook to continue the discussion. Thank you for reading!

%d bloggers like this: